1996 Proton 300 vs. 2010 Jeep Patriot
To start off, 2010 Jeep Patriot is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 300 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Patriot is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jeep Patriot weights approximately 322 kg more than 1996 Proton 300.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Proton 300 | 2010 Jeep Patriot | |
| Make | Proton | Jeep |
| Model | 300 | Patriot |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1834 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 172 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1115 kg | 1437 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4409 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1755 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1669 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2634 mm |
