1996 Proton 300 vs. 2010 Renault Megane
To start off, 2010 Renault Megane is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 300 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Megane (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1996 Proton 300. (75 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1996 Proton 300.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Renault Megane (152 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Proton 300. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Proton 300.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Proton 300 | 2010 Renault Megane | |
Make | Proton | Renault |
Model | 300 | Megane |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 108 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2690 mm |