1996 Proton 300 vs. 2012 Holden Calais
To start off, 2012 Holden Calais is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 300 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Holden Calais is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Calais. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Proton 300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Holden Calais has automatic transmission and 1996 Proton 300 has manual transmission. 1996 Proton 300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Holden Calais will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Proton 300 | 2012 Holden Calais | |
| Make | Proton | Holden |
| Model | 300 | Calais |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1834 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 344 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
