1996 Proton 300 vs. 2012 Mazda 6
To start off, 2012 Mazda 6 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 300 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda 6 weights approximately 369 kg more than 1996 Proton 300.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Proton 300 | 2012 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Proton | Mazda |
Model | 300 | 6 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1834 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 170 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1115 kg | 1484 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4755 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1795 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2789 mm |