1996 Proton 300 vs. 2013 Cadillac XTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac XTS is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 300 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac XTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac XTS weights approximately 797 kg more than 1996 Proton 300.
Because 2013 Cadillac XTS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Proton 300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Cadillac XTS has automatic transmission and 1996 Proton 300 has manual transmission. 1996 Proton 300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac XTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Proton 300 | 2013 Cadillac XTS | |
Make | Proton | Cadillac |
Model | 300 | XTS |
Year Released | 1996 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1834 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 314 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1115 kg | 1912 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 5131 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1852 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2831 mm |