1996 Proton 400 vs. 1955 Talbot T 26
To start off, 1996 Proton 400 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Talbot T 26 (197 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1996 Proton 400. (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1955 Talbot T 26 should accelerate faster than 1996 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Talbot T 26 weights approximately 535 kg more than 1996 Proton 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Talbot T 26 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Talbot T 26. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Proton 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Proton 400 | 1955 Talbot T 26 | |
Make | Proton | Talbot |
Model | 400 | T 26 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1955 |
Engine Size | 1466 cc | 4482 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1075 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1890 mm |