1996 Proton 400 vs. 1976 Renault 20
To start off, 1996 Proton 400 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Renault 20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Renault 20 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Proton 400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Renault 20 (96 HP) has 29 more horse power than 1996 Proton 400. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Renault 20 should accelerate faster than 1996 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Renault 20 weights approximately 60 kg more than 1996 Proton 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Renault 20 (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Proton 400. (123 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1976 Renault 20 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Proton 400.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Proton 400 | 1976 Renault 20 | |
| Make | Proton | Renault |
| Model | 400 | 20 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1647 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 96 HP |
| Torque | 123 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1115 kg | 1175 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2670 mm |
