1996 Proton 400 vs. 1980 Seat Ritmo

To start off, 1996 Proton 400 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Seat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Seat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,466 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Proton 400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Proton 400 (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1980 Seat Ritmo. (63 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Proton 400 should accelerate faster than 1980 Seat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Proton 400 weights approximately 195 kg more than 1980 Seat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Proton 400 (126 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Seat Ritmo. (92 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1996 Proton 400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Seat Ritmo.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Proton 400 1980 Seat Ritmo
Make Proton Seat
Model 400 Ritmo
Year Released 1996 1980
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1466 cc 1197 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 89 HP 63 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5800 RPM
Torque 126 Nm 92 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1075 kg 880 kg
Vehicle Length 4370 mm 3950 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1660 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2510 mm 2460 mm