1996 Proton 400 vs. 1991 Renault Clio

To start off, 1996 Proton 400 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Proton 400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Proton 400 (67 HP) has 19 more horse power than 1991 Renault Clio. (48 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Proton 400 should accelerate faster than 1991 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Proton 400 weights approximately 305 kg more than 1991 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Proton 400 (123 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Renault Clio. (81 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1996 Proton 400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Renault Clio.

Compare all specifications: