1996 Proton 400 vs. 1997 Volvo C70
To start off, 1997 Volvo C70 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 400 would be higher. At 2,319 cc (5 cylinders), 1997 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Volvo C70 (236 HP) has 169 more horse power than 1996 Proton 400. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1996 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Volvo C70 weights approximately 355 kg more than 1996 Proton 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Volvo C70 (330 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 207 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Proton 400. (123 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1997 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Proton 400.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Proton 400 | 1997 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Proton | Volvo |
Model | 400 | C70 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2319 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 236 HP |
Torque | 123 Nm | 330 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 1490 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2670 mm |