1996 Proton 400 vs. 1999 Acura EL
To start off, 1999 Acura EL is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 400 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Proton 400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Acura EL (127 HP) has 60 more horse power than 1996 Proton 400. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Acura EL should accelerate faster than 1996 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Proton 400 weights approximately 56 kg more than 1999 Acura EL.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Acura EL (145 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Proton 400. (123 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1999 Acura EL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Proton 400.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Proton 400 | 1999 Acura EL | |
Make | Proton | Acura |
Model | 400 | EL |
Year Released | 1996 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 127 HP |
Torque | 123 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 1079 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4478 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1704 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1394 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2619 mm |