1996 Proton 400 vs. 2001 Proton 300
To start off, 2001 Proton 300 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 400 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Proton 400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Proton 300 (75 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1996 Proton 400. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Proton 300 should accelerate faster than 1996 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Proton 400 weights approximately 97 kg more than 2001 Proton 300.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Proton 400 (123 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Proton 300. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1996 Proton 400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Proton 300.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Proton 400 | 2001 Proton 300 | |
Make | Proton | Proton |
Model | 400 | 300 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 75 HP |
Torque | 123 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 1038 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2450 mm |