1996 Proton 400 vs. 2002 Proton Impian
To start off, 2002 Proton Impian is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 400 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Proton 400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Proton Impian (102 HP) has 35 more horse power than 1996 Proton 400. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Proton Impian should accelerate faster than 1996 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Proton Impian weights approximately 70 kg more than 1996 Proton 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Proton Impian (140 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Proton 400. (123 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Proton Impian will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Proton 400.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Proton 400 | 2002 Proton Impian | |
| Make | Proton | Proton |
| Model | 400 | Impian |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1584 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 102 HP |
| Torque | 123 Nm | 140 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 1205 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2610 mm |
