1996 Proton 400 vs. 2005 Renault Megane
To start off, 2005 Renault Megane is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 400 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Megane (108 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1996 Proton 400. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1996 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Megane weights approximately 800 kg more than 1996 Proton 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Proton 400 (108 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Megane. (105 Nm). This means 1996 Proton 400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Proton 400 | 2005 Renault Megane | |
| Make | Proton | Renault |
| Model | 400 | Megane |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 108 Nm | 105 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1770 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2740 mm |
