1996 Proton 400 vs. 2006 Suzuki Reno
To start off, 2006 Suzuki Reno is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 400 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Suzuki Reno is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Suzuki Reno (126 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1996 Proton 400. (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Suzuki Reno should accelerate faster than 1996 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Proton 400 weights approximately 10 kg more than 2006 Suzuki Reno.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Suzuki Reno (178 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Proton 400. (126 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Suzuki Reno will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Proton 400.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Proton 400 | 2006 Suzuki Reno | |
| Make | Proton | Suzuki |
| Model | 400 | Reno |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1466 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 126 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 126 Nm | 178 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1075 kg | 1065 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2610 mm |
