1996 Proton 400 vs. 2008 Holden UTE
To start off, 2008 Holden UTE is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 400 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden UTE (242 HP) has 175 more horse power than 1996 Proton 400. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1996 Proton 400.
Because 2008 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Proton 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden UTE (330 Nm) has 207 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Proton 400. (123 Nm). This means 2008 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Proton 400.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Proton 400 | 2008 Holden UTE | |
Make | Proton | Holden |
Model | 400 | UTE |
Year Released | 1996 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 242 HP |
Torque | 123 Nm | 330 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |