1996 Proton 400 vs. 2009 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2009 Holden Commodore is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 400 would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 293 more horse power than 1996 Proton 400. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1996 Proton 400.
Because 2009 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Proton 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Proton 400. (123 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Proton 400.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Proton 400 | 2009 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Proton | Holden |
Model | 400 | Commodore |
Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 5976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 360 HP |
Torque | 123 Nm | 290 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |