1996 Proton 400 vs. 2009 Renault Grand Scenic

To start off, 2009 Renault Grand Scenic is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 400 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Proton 400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Renault Grand Scenic (118 HP) has 51 more horse power than 1996 Proton 400. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Renault Grand Scenic should accelerate faster than 1996 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Renault Grand Scenic weights approximately 521 kg more than 1996 Proton 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Renault Grand Scenic (300 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Proton 400. (123 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Renault Grand Scenic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Proton 400.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Proton 400 2009 Renault Grand Scenic
Make Proton Renault
Model 400 Grand Scenic
Year Released 1996 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1998 cc 1870 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 67 HP 118 HP
Torque 123 Nm 300 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 2000 RPM
Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1135 kg 1656 kg
Vehicle Length 4280 mm 4500 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1640 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1820 mm
Wheelbase Size 2510 mm 2740 mm