1996 Proton 400 vs. 2011 Renault Symbol
To start off, 2011 Renault Symbol is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 400 would be higher. At 1,466 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Proton 400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Proton 400 (89 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2011 Renault Symbol. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Proton 400 should accelerate faster than 2011 Renault Symbol. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Proton 400 weights approximately 75 kg more than 2011 Renault Symbol. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Proton 400 (126 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Renault Symbol. (105 Nm). This means 1996 Proton 400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Renault Symbol.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Proton 400 | 2011 Renault Symbol | |
Make | Proton | Renault |
Model | 400 | Symbol |
Year Released | 1996 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1466 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 126 Nm | 105 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1075 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4261 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1639 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1439 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2473 mm |