1996 Reliant Scimitar vs. 2005 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2005 Ford Ecosport is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Reliant Scimitar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Reliant Scimitar would be higher. At 1,398 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Reliant Scimitar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Reliant Scimitar (105 HP) has 11 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ecosport. (94 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Reliant Scimitar should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1996 Reliant Scimitar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Reliant Scimitar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Reliant Scimitar | 2005 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Reliant | Ford |
Model | Scimitar | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1398 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 94 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2490 mm |