1996 Renault 19 vs. 1982 Zastava 1500
To start off, 1996 Renault 19 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Renault 19 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault 19 (106 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 1500. (74 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault 19 should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault 19 weights approximately 185 kg more than 1982 Zastava 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Renault 19 (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 1500. (113 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1996 Renault 19 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 1500.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Renault 19 | 1982 Zastava 1500 | |
| Make | Renault | Zastava |
| Model | 19 | 1500 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 1794 cc | 1481 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 113 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2430 mm |
