1996 Renault Clio vs. 1972 Simca 1000
To start off, 1996 Renault Clio is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Simca 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Simca 1000 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault Clio (250 HP) has 191 more horse power than 1972 Simca 1000. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1972 Simca 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Clio weights approximately 790 kg more than 1972 Simca 1000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Renault Clio (407 Nm) has 309 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Simca 1000. (98 Nm). This means 1996 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Simca 1000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Renault Clio | 1972 Simca 1000 | |
| Make | Renault | Simca |
| Model | Clio | 1000 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1972 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Middle | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 1294 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 407 Nm | 98 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1650 kg | 860 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 3810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2230 mm |
