1996 Renault Clio vs. 1987 Suzuki Swift
To start off, 1996 Renault Clio is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Suzuki Swift. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Suzuki Swift would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1996 Renault Clio is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Renault Clio. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Suzuki Swift, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Renault Clio | 1987 Suzuki Swift | |
Make | Renault | Suzuki |
Model | Clio | Swift |
Year Released | 1996 | 1987 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 3590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1360 mm |