1996 Renault Clio vs. 1994 Volkswagen Gol

To start off, 1996 Renault Clio is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Volkswagen Gol. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Volkswagen Gol would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault Clio (250 HP) has 142 more horse power than 1994 Volkswagen Gol. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1994 Volkswagen Gol. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Clio weights approximately 654 kg more than 1994 Volkswagen Gol. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1996 Renault Clio is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Renault Clio. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Volkswagen Gol, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Renault Clio (407 Nm) has 240 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Volkswagen Gol. (167 Nm). This means 1996 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Volkswagen Gol.

Compare all specifications: