1996 Renault Clio vs. 2001 SsangYong Korando
To start off, 2001 SsangYong Korando is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Renault Clio would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 SsangYong Korando weights approximately 114 kg more than 1996 Renault Clio.
Because 2001 SsangYong Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 SsangYong Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Renault Clio | 2001 SsangYong Korando | |
Make | Renault | SsangYong |
Model | Clio | Korando |
Year Released | 1996 | 2001 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1650 kg | 1764 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2490 mm |