1996 Renault Clio vs. 2003 Proton Impian

To start off, 2003 Proton Impian is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Renault Clio would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault Clio (250 HP) has 149 more horse power than 2003 Proton Impian. (101 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2003 Proton Impian. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Clio weights approximately 445 kg more than 2003 Proton Impian. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1996 Renault Clio is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Renault Clio. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Proton Impian, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Renault Clio (407 Nm) has 267 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Proton Impian. (140 Nm). This means 1996 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Proton Impian. 2003 Proton Impian has automatic transmission and 1996 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 1996 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Proton Impian will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: