1996 Renault Clio vs. 2005 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 2005 SsangYong Musso is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Renault Clio would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 SsangYong Musso is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault Clio (250 HP) has 33 more horse power than 2005 SsangYong Musso. (217 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2005 SsangYong Musso. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 SsangYong Musso weights approximately 280 kg more than 1996 Renault Clio.
Because 2005 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Renault Clio (407 Nm) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 SsangYong Musso. (316 Nm). This means 1996 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 SsangYong Musso.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Renault Clio | 2005 SsangYong Musso | |
Make | Renault | SsangYong |
Model | Clio | Musso |
Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 217 HP |
Torque | 407 Nm | 316 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1650 kg | 1930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2640 mm |