1996 Renault Clio vs. 2006 Subaru Outback

To start off, 2006 Subaru Outback is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Renault Clio would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault Clio (250 HP) has 75 more horse power than 2006 Subaru Outback. (175 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2006 Subaru Outback. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Clio weights approximately 144 kg more than 2006 Subaru Outback. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2006 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Renault Clio (407 Nm) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Subaru Outback. (229 Nm). This means 1996 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Subaru Outback.

Compare all specifications: