1996 Renault Clio vs. 2010 Aston Martin One-77
To start off, 2010 Aston Martin One-77 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Renault Clio would be higher. At 7,300 cc (12 cylinders), 2010 Aston Martin One-77 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Aston Martin One-77 (750 HP) has 500 more horse power than 1996 Renault Clio. (250 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Aston Martin One-77 should accelerate faster than 1996 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Clio weights approximately 20 kg more than 2010 Aston Martin One-77.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Aston Martin One-77 (750 Nm) has 343 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Renault Clio. (407 Nm). This means 2010 Aston Martin One-77 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Renault Clio | 2010 Aston Martin One-77 | |
| Make | Renault | Aston Martin |
| Model | Clio | One-77 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 7300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 750 HP |
| Torque | 407 Nm | 750 Nm |
| Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 354 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1650 kg | 1630 kg |
