1996 Renault Clio vs. 2012 GMC Savana

To start off, 2012 GMC Savana is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Renault Clio would be higher. At 6,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 GMC Savana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 GMC Savana (260 HP) has 10 more horse power than 1996 Renault Clio. (250 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 GMC Savana should accelerate faster than 1996 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 GMC Savana weights approximately 1111 kg more than 1996 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 GMC Savana (711 Nm) has 304 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Renault Clio. (407 Nm). This means 2012 GMC Savana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Renault Clio. 2012 GMC Savana has automatic transmission and 1996 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 1996 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 GMC Savana will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: