1996 Renault Clio vs. 2013 Nissan Armada

To start off, 2013 Nissan Armada is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Renault Clio would be higher. At 5,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Nissan Armada (313 HP) has 63 more horse power than 1996 Renault Clio. (250 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1996 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1002 kg more than 1996 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2013 Nissan Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Renault Clio. (407 Nm). This means 2013 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Renault Clio. 2013 Nissan Armada has automatic transmission and 1996 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 1996 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Nissan Armada will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: