1996 Renault Fifties vs. 2004 Volvo S40
To start off, 2004 Volvo S40 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Renault Fifties. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Renault Fifties would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo S40 (170 HP) has 110 more horse power than 1996 Renault Fifties. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1996 Renault Fifties. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Fifties weights approximately 320 kg more than 2004 Volvo S40.
Because 1996 Renault Fifties is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Renault Fifties. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Renault Fifties | 2004 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Renault | Volvo |
Model | Fifties | S40 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1099 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 170 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1255 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 60 L |