1996 Renault Megane vs. 1959 Triumph Herald
To start off, 1996 Renault Megane is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 1,870 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault Megane (101 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1959 Triumph Herald. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1959 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Megane weights approximately 435 kg more than 1959 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Renault Megane (201 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Triumph Herald. (84 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1996 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Renault Megane | 1959 Triumph Herald | |
Make | Renault | Triumph |
Model | Megane | Herald |
Year Released | 1996 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1870 cc | 1147 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 201 Nm | 84 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 69.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 76 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1215 kg | 780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 29 L |