1996 Renault Megane vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1996 Renault Megane is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 1,869 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault Megane (94 HP) has 54 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Megane weights approximately 150 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Toyota Master RR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Toyota Master RR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Renault Megane | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Renault | Toyota |
| Model | Megane | Master RR |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1869 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 75 L |
