1996 Renault Megane vs. 2000 Renault Clio
To start off, 2000 Renault Clio is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Renault Megane would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Megane weights approximately 285 kg more than 2000 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Renault Megane | 2000 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Renault | Renault |
| Model | Megane | Clio |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 935 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2770 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 50 L |
