1996 Renault Megane vs. 2010 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2010 Holden Caprice is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Renault Megane would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Holden Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Renault Megane | 2010 Holden Caprice | |
Make | Renault | Holden |
Model | Megane | Caprice |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1390 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 278 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |