1996 Renault Megane vs. 2011 Renault Clio
To start off, 2011 Renault Clio is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Renault Megane would be higher. At 1,868 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault Megane (96 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2011 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 2011 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Renault Megane (200 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1996 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Renault Megane | 2011 Renault Clio | |
Make | Renault | Renault |
Model | Megane | Clio |
Year Released | 1996 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1868 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 200 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.7 seconds | 15 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 50 L |