1996 Renault Megane vs. 2012 Aston Martin DB9
To start off, 2012 Aston Martin DB9 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Renault Megane would be higher. At 5,900 cc (12 cylinders), 2012 Aston Martin DB9 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Aston Martin DB9 weights approximately 205 kg more than 1996 Renault Megane.
Because 2012 Aston Martin DB9 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Aston Martin DB9. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Renault Megane | 2012 Aston Martin DB9 | |
Make | Renault | Aston Martin |
Model | Megane | DB9 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1390 cc | 5900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 470 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1650 kg | 1855 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2746 mm |