1996 Renault Megane vs. 2012 Opel Combo
To start off, 2012 Opel Combo is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Renault Megane would be higher. At 1,870 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault Megane (97 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2012 Opel Combo. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 2012 Opel Combo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Renault Megane (201 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Opel Combo. (126 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1996 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Opel Combo.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Renault Megane | 2012 Opel Combo | |
Make | Renault | Opel |
Model | Megane | Combo |
Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1870 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 201 Nm | 126 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 73.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 80.6 mm |
Top Speed | 183 km/hour | 164 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.3 seconds | 14 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 52 L |