1996 Renault Megane vs. 2013 Mazda CX-5
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-5 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Renault Megane would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Mazda CX-5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Megane weights approximately 162 kg more than 2013 Mazda CX-5.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Renault Megane | 2013 Mazda CX-5 | |
Make | Renault | Mazda |
Model | Megane | CX-5 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1390 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 153 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1650 kg | 1488 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2700 mm |