1996 Renault Safrane vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Minica is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Renault Safrane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Renault Safrane would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Renault Safrane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Safrane weights approximately 815 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2005 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Renault Safrane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Mitsubishi Minica has automatic transmission and 1996 Renault Safrane has manual transmission. 1996 Renault Safrane will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Mitsubishi Minica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Renault Safrane | 2005 Mitsubishi Minica | |
| Make | Renault | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Safrane | Minica |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 657 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 710 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2350 mm |
