1996 Rolls-Royce Silver Spirit vs. 2009 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2009 Nissan Pixo is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rolls-Royce Silver Spirit. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rolls-Royce Silver Spirit would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Rolls-Royce Silver Spirit is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Rolls-Royce Silver Spirit (208 HP) has 140 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Rolls-Royce Silver Spirit should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Pixo.
Because 1996 Rolls-Royce Silver Spirit is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Rolls-Royce Silver Spirit. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Pixo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Rolls-Royce Silver Spirit | 2009 Nissan Pixo | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Nissan |
| Model | Silver Spirit | Pixo |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6750 cc | 996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 68 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 3580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1400 mm |
