1996 Rover 200 vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1996 Rover 200 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Triumph 2000 (91 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1996 Rover 200. (85 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 35 kg more than 1996 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Rover 200 (170 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1996 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Rover 200 | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Rover | Triumph |
Model | 200 | 2000 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2700 mm |