1996 Rover 200 vs. 1984 Saab 99
To start off, 1996 Rover 200 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Saab 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Saab 99 would be higher. At 1,985 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Saab 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Rover 200 (108 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1984 Saab 99. (85 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 1984 Saab 99. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Saab 99 weights approximately 81 kg more than 1996 Rover 200.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Saab 99 (147 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 200. (137 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 1984 Saab 99 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Rover 200 | 1984 Saab 99 | |
Make | Rover | Saab |
Model | 200 | 99 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1589 cc | 1985 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 137 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 1146 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2480 mm |