1996 Rover 200 vs. 1992 Rover 620i
To start off, 1996 Rover 200 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 620i. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 620i would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Rover 620i is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Rover 200 (143 HP @ 6750 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1992 Rover 620i. (113 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 620i. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Rover 620i weights approximately 195 kg more than 1996 Rover 200.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Rover 200 (174 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 620i. (172 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1996 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 620i.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Rover 200 | 1992 Rover 620i | |
| Make | Rover | Rover |
| Model | 200 | 620i |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1794 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 113 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6750 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 174 Nm | 172 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 1255 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1390 mm |
