1996 Rover 200 vs. 1992 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 1996 Rover 200 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Rover 200 weights approximately 35 kg more than 1992 Toyota Lite Ace.
Because 1992 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Rover 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Rover 200 | 1992 Toyota Lite Ace | |
Make | Rover | Toyota |
Model | 200 | Lite Ace |
Year Released | 1996 | 1992 |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1910 mm |