1996 Rover 200 vs. 1998 Acura TL
To start off, 1998 Acura TL is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 200 would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Acura TL (200 HP) has 98 more horse power than 1996 Rover 200. (102 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 200.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1998 Acura TL has automatic transmission and 1996 Rover 200 has manual transmission. 1996 Rover 200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Acura TL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Rover 200 | 1998 Acura TL | |
| Make | Rover | Acura |
| Model | 200 | TL |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1395 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 102 HP | 200 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 4864 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1786 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1405 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2840 mm |
