1996 Rover 200 vs. 2004 Volkswagen Polo

To start off, 2004 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,896 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Rover 200 (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2004 Volkswagen Polo. (63 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 2004 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 163 kg more than 1996 Rover 200.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Rover 200 (127 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Volkswagen Polo. (125 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 1996 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Volkswagen Polo.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Rover 200 2004 Volkswagen Polo
Make Rover Volkswagen
Model 200 Polo
Year Released 1996 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1395 cc 1896 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 102 HP 63 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 127 Nm 125 Nm
Torque RPM 5000 RPM 1600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1030 kg 1193 kg
Vehicle Length 3980 mm 4170 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1650 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2510 mm 2590 mm