1996 Rover 200 vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 200 would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 51 more horse power than 1996 Rover 200. (102 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 200.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 200. (127 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 200. 2009 Holden Epica has automatic transmission and 1996 Rover 200 has manual transmission. 1996 Rover 200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Holden Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Rover 200 | 2009 Holden Epica | |
Make | Rover | Holden |
Model | 200 | Epica |
Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1396 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 127 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2700 mm |