1996 Rover 200 vs. 2010 Renault Thalia
To start off, 2010 Renault Thalia is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Thalia (104 HP) has 19 more horse power than 1996 Rover 200. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Thalia should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Rover 200 weights approximately 135 kg more than 2010 Renault Thalia.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Rover 200 (170 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Thalia. (148 Nm). This means 1996 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Thalia.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Rover 200 | 2010 Renault Thalia | |
Make | Rover | Renault |
Model | 200 | Thalia |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 104 HP |
Torque | 170 Nm | 148 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 4261 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1639 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1439 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2473 mm |